If you want to keep the version of Readme.md which is on the master branch, then you would need to run the following command: Suppose you're on the master branch merging in staging: Otherwise, how would git know what to merge? You can, however, check out the version from either branch you're merging using git checkout -ours or git checkout -theirs. There's no way to merge without resolving conflicts. Here is the output produced when merging using Github's instructions:ĬONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test.cppĪutomatic merge failed fix conflicts and then commit the result. Now I simply want Git to perform the merge and stop breaking index files. This has turned into a complete waste of time, and I am no longer interested in trying to do it Git's way since it wastes so much time. I also tried resetting the problem file according to Ignore files during merge with plans to copy/paste the one line needed, but the broken index persists. One set of errors turns into another set of errors, ad infinitum. I tried to repair the merge with Git merge errors. How do I make Git perform the merge, ensure the person who provided the pull request gets credit for it, and stop breaking index files? What I don't know how to do is make Git perform the merge and stop complaining about broken index files. I know how to fix the one line in the one conflicting file. # Step 2: Merge the changes and update on GitHub. # Step 1: From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes. It's important to perform this merge so the person submitting the pr gets credit for it. The instructions for merging the pull request are provided by Github are as follows. I'm trying to merge a pull request that has one conflict in one file (see below).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |